Scientific Experimental Method
Observation
and Scientific Advance
Observation and experiment are the two sources
of scientific knowledge. Aristotle was the father of the Greek
sciences, and has made a lasting contribution to physics, astronomy,
biology, meteorology and other sciences. The Greek method of acquiring
scientific knowledge was mainly speculative, hence science as
such could make little headway during the time of the Greeks.
The Arabs who were more realistic and practical in their approach
adopted the experimental method to harness scientific knowledge.
Observation and experiment formed the vehicle of their scientific
pursuits; hence they gave a new outlook to science of which the
world had been totally unaware. Their achievements in the field
of experimental science added a golden chapter to the annals of
scientific knowledge and opened a new vista for the growth of
modern sciences.
Europe's scientific advances during the Dark Ages (5th to 15th
century) were handicapped.
The narrowly dogmatic view of some conservative churches that
led to the sentencing of Galileo was responsible for this setback.
Unlike the teachings of some church in removing reason from the
equation of belief, observation, reason and intellect are integrated
into the fabric of the Islamic belief. For Muslims, the first
word revealed to Prophet Muhammad was "Read." Thus,
intellect and religion work together. There are hundreds of verses
in the Holy Qur'an inspiring its readers to observe and reflect.
Here are some examples:
"Behold! In the creation of the heavens
and the earth; in the alteration of the night and the day; in
the sailing of the ships through the ocean for the profit of mankind;
in the rain which God sends down from the skies and the life which
He gives there with to an earth that is dead; in the beasts of
all kinds that he scatters through the earth; in the ordinance
of the winds, and the clouds obedient between heaven and earth;...
(here) indeed are signs for people who have sense." Qur'an,
2:64.
"And do they not see that We do drive
rain to parched soil, and produce therewith crops, providing food
for their cattle and themselves? Have they not the vision?"
Qur'an, 32:27.
"Say: 'travel through the earth
and see what was the end of those before you.'" Qur'an,
30:42.
"On earth are signs for those of assured
faith, as also in your own selves: will you not then see?"
Qur'an, 51:20.
"Say: 'are those equal, those who know
and those who do not know?'" Qur'an,
39:9.
"Is this then a fake, or is it you that do not see?"
Qur'an, 52:15.
"Thus God brings the
dead to life and shows you His signs: Perchance you may understand."
Qur'an, 2:73.
Muslims consider the universe
a visible sign of God. To understand God's Omnipotence, it is
necessary to investigate all the aspects of this universe. This
belief was manifested in a wealth of Muslim scientific advances
that lead to the formation of the renaissance. George Sarton in
his book “Introduction to the History of Science”
gave a tribute to an array of Muslim scientists who at
the roots of this scientific revolution during the Middle Ages,
he said:
"It will suffice here to
evoke a few glorious names without contemporary equivalents in
the West: Jabir ibn Haiyan, al-Kindi, al-Khwarizmi, al-Fargani,
al-Razi, Thabit ibn Qurra, al-Battani, Hunain ibn Ishaq, al-Farabi,
Ibrahim ibn Sinan, al-Masudi, al-Tabari, Abul Wafa, 'Ali ibn Abbas,
Abul Qasim, Ibn al-Jazzar, al-Biruni, Ibn Sina, Ibn Yunus, al-Kashi,
Ibn al-Haitham, 'Ali Ibn 'Isa al-Ghazali, al-zarqab, Omar Khayyam.
A magnificent array of names which it would not be difficult to
extend. If anyone tells you that the Middle Ages were scientifically
sterile, just quote these men to him, all of whom flourished within
a short period, 750 to 1100 A.D."
It is absolutely wrong to assume that experimental
method was formulated in Europe. Roger Bacon, who, in the west
is known as the originator of experimental method, had himself
received his training from the pupils of Spanish Moors, and had
learnt everything from Muslim sources. The influence of Ibn al-Haitham
on Roger Bacon is clearly visible in his works.
Europe was very slow to recognize the Islamic origin of her much
advertised scientific (experimental) method. In his book, “The
Making of Humanity,” Briffault states,
"It was under their successors at the
Oxford School that Roger Bacon learned Arabic and Arabic science.
Neither Roger Bacon nor his later namesake has any title to be
credited with having introduced the experimental method. Roger
Bacon was no more than one of the apostles of Muslim science and
method to Christian Europe; and he never wearied of declaring
that the knowledge of Arabic and Arabic science was for his contemporaries
the only way to true knowledge.
Discussions as to who was the originator of the experimental method......are
part of the colossal misrepresentation of the origins of European
civilization. The experimental method of Arabs was by Bacon's
time widespread and eagerly cultivated throughout Europe....Science
is the most momentous contribution of Arab civilization to the
modern world, but its fruits were slow in ripening. Not until
long after Moorish culture had sunk back into darkness did the
giant to which it had given birth, rise in his might. It was not
science only which brought Europe back to life. Other and manifold
influences from the civilization of Islam communicated its first
glow to European life.
For although there is not a single aspect of European growth in
which the decisive influence of Islamic culture is not traceable,
nowhere is it so clear and momentous as in the genesis of that
power which constitutes the permanent distinctive force of the
modern world, and the supreme source of its victory-natural science
and the scientific spirit..,
The debt of our science to that of the Arabs does not consist
in startling discoveries or revolutionary theories; science owes
a great deal more to Arab culture, it owes its existence....The
ancient world was, as we saw, pre-scientific. The astronomy and
mathematics of Greeks were a foreign importation never thoroughly
acclimatized in Greek culture. The Greeks systematized, generalized
and theorized, but the patient ways of investigations, the accumulation
of positive knowledge, the minute methods of science, detailed
and prolonged observation and experimental inquiry were altogether
alien to the Greek temperament.
Only in Hellenistic Alexandria was any approach to scientific
work conducted in the ancient classical world. That spirit and
those methods were introduced into the European world by the Arabs."'
In his outstanding work “The
Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam,”
Dr. M. Iqbal, the poet of Islam writes,
"The first important point to note about
the spirit of Muslim culture then is that for purposes of knowledge,
it fixes its gaze on the concrete, the finite. It is further clear
that the birth of the method of observation and experiment in
Islam was due not to a compromise with Greek thought but to prolonged
intellectual warfare with it. In fact the influence of Greeks
who, as Briffault says, were interested chiefly in theory, not
in facts, tended rather to obscure the Muslim's vision of the
Qur'an, and for at least two centuries kept the practical Arab
temperament from asserting itself and coming to its own."
Thus the experimental method, reason and observation introduced
by the Arabs were responsible for the rapid advancement of science
during the medieval times.